From: Brendan de Caires [bdecaires@pencanada.ca]
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 10:46 AM
To: 'Brendan de Caires'
Subject: Member eBulletin February 2010
|
|
Member
e-Bulletin |
|||||
|
|
|
PEN
|
||||
Events
|
Child
Soldier: Banned in February 26, 7:30 pm | Orwellian language and our human rights obligations
A
panel discussion with: Afua
Cooper, scholar, author and poet Mark
Kingwell,
philosopher and critic Judy
Rebick, social justice expert and
activist Moderated by Carol Off, author and broadcaster In
July 2009, Embassy magazine reported that Doors open at 7 pm $10 at the door. All proceeds go
to PEN For more information, call
Answerline at 416-393-7131 ……………………………………………………… Beatrice and Virgil in April 10 |
On April 10 in Tickets
will be available from the Reid Theatre in ……………………………………………………… The Globe and Mail
Open House Festival Proceeds
from the festival will help support PEN
Ian
McEwan,
Linden
MacIntyre, Colm Tóibín,
Calvin
Trillin, Pico
Iyer, Camille
Paglia
and Alexander
McCall Smith are
some of the authors who will be appearing at the upcoming Open House Literary
Festival. Detailed schedule and booking information. |
|||||
Writers in Prison
|
Liu Xiaobo receives 11 year prison sentence In December 2009, Liu Xiaobo, an internationally-recognized literary critic and
former and Honorary President of Independent Chinese PEN Center (ICPC), was sentenced to 11 years in prison and two years
deprivation of political rights for “incitement to subversion of state
power,” through writing and publishing Charter 08, a
document calling for political reform and human rights. President of International PEN, John Ralston Saul, commented that “Liu Xiaobo's
case is about agreed international human rights standards, not merely the
internal affairs of On
February 11, 2010, it was reported
that Liu’s appeal was rejected by a |
|||||
Freedom of Expression in
|
SCC rules on “public interest responsible journalism” On
December 22, 2009, the Supreme Court of Canada’s (SCC) decisions in Grant
v. Torstar and Quan v.
Cusson – PEN Part of
the Grant decision observes that “It is simply beyond debate that the
limited defences available to press-related defendants may have the effect of
inhibiting political discourse and debate on matters of public importance,
and impeding the cut and thrust of discussion necessary to discovery of the
truth.” It also states that “People in public life are entitled to expect
that the media and other reporters will act responsibly in protecting them
from false accusations and innuendo. They are not, however, entitled to
demand perfection and the inevitable silencing of critical comment that a
standard of perfection would impose.” In his analysis
of the SCC decisions, Brian Rogers, Legal Counsel to the Media
Coalition which intervened in both cases, points out that by setting out the
requirements for a new “responsible communication” defence, the SCC
“recognized that the ‘traditional media’ are being complemented by other
means of communication, usually online, which may not involve journalists.” |
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
|
If someone sent you this ebulletin and you
would like to support free expression in |
||||||