THE CATHOLIC CONTRIBUTION TO THE 12-STEP MOVEMENT
By W. Robert Aufill
cc. from: http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/1996/9610fea1sb.asp
AT first, there were no Catholic members in AA, but their participation
was made possible by the final separation of AA from the Oxford Group.
In New York, the first Catholic member was Morgan R., who acted as AA's first
unofficial liaison with the Catholic Church. Morgan submitted the manuscript
of the book Alcoholics Anonymous ("the Big Book") to the New
York Archdiocesan Committee on Publications and received a favorable response.
The Committee, Morgan reported, "had nothing but the best to say of our
efforts. From their point of view the book was perfectly all right as far as
it went." A few editorial suggestions were readily and gratefully incorporated,
especially in the section treating of prayer and meditation.
Only one change was requested. In Wilson's story, he had "made a rhetorical
flourish to the effect that 'we have found Heaven right here on this good old
earth.'" It was suggested he change "Heaven" to ''Utopia."
"After all, we Catholics are promising folks something much better later
on!" Ernest Kurtz, Not-God: A History of Alcoholics (1979; Center
City, Minn.: Hazelden Educational Materials, 1991), p. 75.
A Catholic non-alcoholic who profoundly influenced AA in its early days was
Fr. Edward Dowling of the Society of Jesus. Although his involvement with AA
was only one of many apostolic and charitable works, his influence on AA was
considerable. His work is valuable as a pattern for Catholics who wish to relate
constructively to AA and other recovery groups.
Dowling was a Jesuit from St. Louis and was the editor of a Catholic publication
called The Queen's Work. "Pass It On": The Story of Bill Wilson
and How the AA Message Reached the World (1984; New York: Alcoholics Anonymous
World Services, Inc., 1991), p. 242, Upon reading the Big Book, he was favorably
impressed and saw parallels between the 12 steps and.aspects of Ignatian spirituality-perhaps
especially the Ignatian admonition to pray as if everything depends on God and
to work as if everything depends on oneself.
Dowling made Wilson's acquaintance on a cold, rainy night in 1940. Wilson grudgingly
admitted the visitor, thinking his unexpected guest was yet another drunk demanding
help and attention. Soon, as they talked, the Jesuit began to share an under
- standing of the spiritual life which was to influence Wilson from that day
forward. Pass It On, p. 242.
This is all the more remarkable because Wilson had never known any Catholics
intimately and felt a lingering prejudice against members of the clergy, of
whatever denomination. As Bill Sees It (1967; New York: Alcoholics Anonymous
World Services, Inc., 1992) p. 119.
Wilson viewed his meeting with Dowling as "a second conversion experience."
Pass It On, p. 242. The crippled Jesuit, he said, "radiated a grace
that filled the room with a sense of Presence" (interestingly enough, Wilson
used the same expression, "sense of Presence,'' to describe his impression
of Winchester Cathedral in England, which had obvious Catholic associations
and where he had first experienced a desire for God many years before). Pass
It On, p. 242. Wilson was feeling depressed and angry at God because, at the
moment, he seemed to be a failure:
As Wilson's biographer tells it, "When Bill asked if there was never to
be any satisfaction, the old man snapped back, 'Never. Never any.' There was
only a kind of divine dissatisfaction that would keep him going, reaching out
always." Robert Thomsen, Bill W., (New York: Harper and Row, 1975),
pp. 308-09.
The priest went on: Having surrendered to God and received back his sobriety,
Wilson could not retract his surrender by demanding an accounting from God when
life did not unfold according to preconceived expectations. Even the sense of
dissatisfaction could be an occasion of spiritual growth.
Dowling then hobbled to the door and declared, as a parting shot, "that
if ever Bill grew impatient, or angry at God's way of doing things, if ever
he forgot to be grateful for being alive right here and now, he, Father Ed Dowling,
would make the trip all the way from St. Louis to wallop him over the head with
his good Irish stick." Thomsen, p. 310. And so began a twenty-year friendship
between Wilson and Dowling, who remained Wilson's spiritual advisor.
Wilson was deeply attracted to the Catholic Church and even received instruction
from Fulton Sheen in 1947. Wilson's wife Lois, looking back on it all, was sure
that he was never really close to conversion; but a close friend thought otherwise:
"I had the impression that at the last minute, he didn't go through with
his conversion because he felt it would not be right for AA." Pass It
On, p. 281.
The simplest explanation is that Wilson remained profoundly ambivalent about
organized religion and its doctrines. Just as he had shied away from the "Absolutes"
of the Oxford Group, so he could not see his way to accepting Catholicism's
own absolutism-in particular, papal infallibility and the efficacy of sacraments:
"Though no disbeliever in all miracles, I still can't picture God working
like that." Kurtz, p. 52.
Concerning infallibility, Wilson wrote to Dowling: "It is ever so hard
to believe that any human beings, no matter who, are able to be infallible about
anything." Kurtz, p. 325. Pass It On, pp. 218-82. In a 1947 letter
to Dowling he said, "I'm more affected than ever by that sweet and powerful
aura of the Church; that marvelous spiritual essence flowing down by the centuries
touches me as no other emanation does, but when I look at the authoritative
layout, despite all the arguments in its favor, I still can't warm up. No affirmative
conviction comes . . . P. S. Oh, if only the Church had a fellow-traveler department,
a cozy spot where one could warm his hands at the fire and bite off only as
much as he could swallow. Maybe I'm just one more shopper looking for a bargain
on that virtue- obedience!"
To Sheen Wilson wrote: "Your sense of humor will, I know, rise to the occasion
when I tell you that, with each passing day, I feel more like a Catholic and
reason more like a Protestant!" Pass It On, p. 282.
This is precisely the challenge faced by Catholic apologists in witnessing to
those in recovery groups: bringing the head and the heart together.
Wilson's difficulties with Catholic faith tell us that-without dilution-we must
make our faith and its graces more accessible by connecting faith with experience.
This does not mean we can neglect reasoned apologetics-far from it. We must
respect people's intelligence. But, as Sheen noted, in some cases, our reasoning
"leaves the modern soul cold, not because its arguments are unconvincing,
but because the modern soul is too confused to g.asp them. " Fulton J.
Sheen, Peace of Soul (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1949), p. 6.
If we offer a plausible account of the religious implications of 12-step recovery,
we can perhaps get a receptive hearing for a fuller evangelization and catechesis.
At the convention marking AA's twentieth anniversary (the society's "coming
of age"), Dowling said, "We know AA's 12 steps of man toward God.
May I suggest God's 12 steps toward man as Christianity has taught them to me."
Alcoholics Anonymous Comes of Age: A Brief History of Alcoholics Anonymous
(New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc., 1991), p. 258. He
then went on to draw out the parallels between AA's steps of recovery and God's
redemption of the human race in Christ, who is both the Incarnate God and the
New Adam of redeemed humanity.
Dowling concluded with Francis Thompson's poem The Hound of Heaven, suggesting
that the poem was "[t]he perfect picture of the AA's quest for God, but
especially God's loving chase for the AA." A.A. Comes of Age, p.
259.
Another important, though somewhat later, Catholic influence on AA was Fr. John
C. Ford, S.J., one of Catholicism's most eminent moral theologians. In the early
forties, Ford himself recovered from alcoholism with AA's help. He became one
of the earliest Catholic proponents of addressing alcoholism as a problem having
spiritual, physiological, and psychological, dimensions.
Ford said that alcohol addiction is a pathology which is not consciously chosen,
but he rejected the deterministic idea that alcoholism is solely a disease without
any moral component: "[I]t obviously has moral dimensions, and that is
one reason why the clergyman is thought to have a special role to play.
"To answer the question: Is alcoholism a moral problem or is it a sickness,
I think the answer is that it is both. I don't think it is true to say that
alcoholism is just a sickness, in the sense that cancer or tuberculosis are
sicknesses. I think there are too many rather obvious differences between the
two to classify alcoholism as a sickness in that sense. On the other hand, I
don't think it is true either to say that alcoholism is just a moral problem.
There are still a good many people who look at an alcoholic as a good-for-nothing
with a weak will or one who doesn't use his willpower . ..
"They keep saying, 'Don't do it again,' over and over. I don't believe
he does it just because he wants to do it or because he is willful. When you
look at the agony that the alcoholic inflicts upon himself over the course of
the years, it seems to me to be very difficult to say he wants to be that way
or he does it on purpose. . . . I think it is fair to speak of alcoholism as
a triple sickness-a sickness of the body, a sickness of the mind, and also a
sickness of the soul." John C. Ford, "The Sickness of Alcoholism:
Still More Clergy Education?", Homiletic and Pastoral Review, Nov.
1986: pp. 10, 12.
Wilson, impressed by Ford's insight, asked him to edit Twelve Steps and Twelve
Traditions (with the Big Book, this is the basic text of 12-step recovery)
and Alcoholics Anonymous Comes of Age. In part, Wilson's concern in
these books was to present the AA program in a way acceptable to Catholic sensibilities.
Kurtz, p. 323.
Ford's contribution to AA was therefore twofold: He drew on both religion and
psychology to show alcoholism as a synthetic problem requiring a synthetic remedy,
and he took seriously the quasi- compulsive nature of addiction while rejecting
both absolute determinism and the attendant pitfalls of a purely therapeutic
approach. He drew on psychological insights, but ultimately shared the sentiments
of Dr. Bob, who used to say, "Don't louse it up with psychiatry."
Darrah, p. 143.
In so many ways, Ford's approach to addiction and recovery remains a model of
spiritual discernment for our own time.