The Universal Free Youth (Child) Foundation / Institute (t.m.)(inc.)- Amendments to the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Children
(c)'06 Media Free Times vol.32 no.1 - all world rights reserved
.LOG
DRAFT - work in progress
Organizations like Free the Children, Save the Children and UNICEF although they seem to be perennially in the embryonic stages of promoting and protecting Child Rights yet they do not deal the most fundamental root causes of child abuse and the prevention of poverty, among other things mainly overpopulation. Finally we cannot begin to pretend to talk about the rights of children, or for that matter the rights of any human being, as long as we live under the scepter of Global War and Weapons of Mass Destruction. It has become popular and acceptable, in the last century to decimate civilian populations, under the genteel rubric of “collateral damage.” in the name of “National Defense” corporations wage perpetual war, on a small planet that has become visibly without political boundaries, since we received our first photos of it transmitted to us from space. We need to get back to basics on this point, “BAN THE BOMB”. Or perhaps more precisely
“BAN THE WMD” even if it is small enough to “take out” a child playing in the sandbox when dropped into the field on the other side of the fence. Please take a look at some of the debris, to find a child’s foot or other body parts, if you need a lecture on this subject.
We cannot act as if we are concerned about the rights of children if we are teaching them the arts of war, torture and violence and mutual assured destruction. One of the mandatory lessons delivered in grade schools in the fifties and sixties was the civil defense program of “Duck and Cover”, in which children were told to duck under a desk in preparation for a nuclear annihilation. Organized religions seem not to be liable, under pornographic censorship laws, when they disseminate graphic sadomasochistic images of “saints” being tortured to death by “the enemy”. The violence of popular gaming and programming, especially that directed at preschoolers and the bombardment of advertisers, seems reasonably a primary violation of the child’s right to a stable psychological environment and yet no mention is made of the child’s right not to be indoctrinated, in the trendy conventions for “The Rights of Children”, when the word “education” is conveniently synonymously used.
One basic and classic flaw, for example in the UNICEF Convention on the Rights of Children is the concept that it is appropriate to conscript children into military service provided they do not serve in the front lines of engagement. Military conscription and military indoctrination that is basically a cult mind control, is fundamentally a violation of human rights at any age.
Here is a further critique in preparation for the manifesto for children now in preparation entitled:
“12 things every 12 year old child should know”:
2:10 PM 11/20/2006
…proposed amendments to the UNICEF Convention on the Rights of the Child:
Article 24 states that: All children have the right to “the highest attainable standard of
health … [including access to] primary health care … nutritious foods and clean
drinking-water.”
In a technological world this would imply a guaranteed livable income for all, especially for children but it can onlt be possible if there is minus zero population. Wage Slavery is slavery and children that need to sell their bodies in order to eat are being cannibalized by their exploiters.
That primary health care must include universal dissemination of information
pertaining to the basic rudiments of health care as “education” as opposed to indoctrination and inculcation esp. advertising, to produce consumers, workers, soldiers etc.
Other points i.e.
The first and foremost is the fundamental
universal law that needs to be deemed compulsory and is generally omitted from
the various declarations or manifestos of Child Rights, is that a child is not
chattel. It may be news to many that although the parents and the society are
responsible for the care and wellbeing of the child, they do not own the child.
A child, or any person, is not property and does not belong to family, church,
state or any person or institution. It is for the worldwide establishment of
this fundamental point, that our “The Universal Free Child Foundation”
(t.m.) is the mandated.
Children having children is a greater crime or
sin against nature than contraception. The unborn child has a right not to be
born into toxic environments of war, famine, overcrowding, addiction, violence,
exploitation, squalor and the child/youth is not an appropriate parent for
other children as parenting of other children or parents (adult children,
handicapped or elderly) takes away the years of youth needed for their own growth
and maturation. The unborn have a right not to be born into deformed, diseased
or mangled bodies and dysfunctional environments.
The most
fundamental root causes of child abuse and the prevention of poverty, among
other things mainly overpopulation
and information and the rights to practice herbal birth control.
Ancestral
wisdom about herbal birth control and the use of emmenagogues
that would
prevent the need for abortion and the use of abortificients should that need arise
It is a scientifically established medical fact
that the healthy age window for childbearing
is between the ages of 24 to 35. That childbearing before, or after this period endangers both the child
and the mother and that therefore it must be universally acceptable that bearing children not in natures
time must be completely avoided
…although it is the conventional definition that
a child is a person between the ages of 1-18 in the case
of procreation not only children but youth from 18-24 should be discouraged and in some cases legally
forbidden to have children. Conversely the young person has the right to explore and exercise their
own sexuality as they deem appropriate without coercion or constraint provided of course it does not
violate the space of others and is done under mutual consent. The child needs to be protected from
sexual violation by others, but must not be sexually repressed in their own natural growth and
investigation of natural bodily functions by the psychological pedophilia of institutional or imperial
religionist dogmas in the name of “moral education” that inadvertently creates the very perversions of
the natural order of things that produce the sex addict and the rapist .
Sucrose is a drug -not a food, it is the root of
most addictions and distributing it to children must be universally outlawed.
Along with all advertising to children …especially sucrose promotion via
advertising is the equivalent of “pushing drugs on children” and sodium
chloride is a poison not a nutritional requirement.
Reverse Osmosis filters to “clean water” are not
the answer in an overcrowded planet; minus zero population is.
All organized religions, philosophies or political
ideologies, may be entitled to claim their right to "freedom of religion"
and “freedom of speech” and to practice whatever brand of catholicism, socialism,
the religion of economics of the World Bank or IMF, Satanic Hollywoodism or whatever
they choose ...they do not however have any right to proselytize their faith
without consent and to violate another persons space or being, especially
a child’s, either physically or mentally through indoctrination or psychological
mind control, via the religion of advertising, or adulterate the mind with
the aid of “chemical psychological warfare” in the form of addictive anti-nutrients
like sucrose, caffeine and other “meds”,
or to censure by depriving the person of information that will effect their
well being like the current universal suppression of ancestral herbal knowledge,
that includes herbal birth control, the lack of which compromises self regulation
of reproductive functions.
Finaly the childs universal right to unconditional
love is not mentioned.
Peace